Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Oh My God...
Tuesday, June 29, 2010
WC Review: Paraguay & Spain
Monday, June 28, 2010
WC Review: Holland & Brazil
Our goalkeeper search is over. Maarten Stekelenburg's the man. Though that Slovak keeper's no slouch either - he even saves shots with his face. Pretty cool. That is, until he mucked it up with the second Sneijder goal.
That said, the story of missed chances and decent goalkeeping was the story of Holland's 2-1 win over Slovakia. On both sides. Holland should've killed the game off early in the second half, while the Slovaks had even better chances to get to 1-1. Stekelenburg pulling off two stunning saves in the space of 5 minutes or so. While it hung in the balance, you always felt there was always one more goal in it -it just wasn't clear whether it'd be Dutch or Slovak. Great for the neutral, but terrible for fans of either side.
In the end, the Dutch did seal it late, but indicative of the problems they're going to have to work out, they conceded a silly penalty with the last kick of the game. They're so going to have to work on their defending, and after that, their finishing, if they're going to get beyond the quarters.Isn't the whole World Cup experience wonderful? You get to watch Holland play on Monday afternoon, Brazil on Monday evening, and by Friday afternoon, you get to watch them play each other. Just wonderful.
Oh yeah, speaking of Brazil. They got through. Surprise!!! 3-0. Surprise!!!
As easy a Round of 16 game as you'd ever find. (Wait. Let me side-track here. I don't like terming this the 2nd Round or Round of 16. Let's stick to the French. Huitieme. Makes sense. Then quatrieme as in quarters. Sounds more stylish anyway, for the wannabe Arsewiper).
The first half hour is rather mundane. Chile looking quite good actually, and Brazil looking rather sleepy. In fact, Chile probably had the better shots at goal, and I'm already getting to switch off the TV and take my shower. The anticipation was that things would only heat up in the last bits of the game. Don't get any funny ideas.
So. In the space of 4-5 minutes after that, Brazil puts the game to bed with some ruthless finishing. Absolutely ruthless. The stuff you'd only normally see once in a blue moon. Or more recently, when Germany put England away. So it's 2-0 by minute 35, and then I go take a shower.
No point watching anymore, until I get alerted by the neighbourhood vuvuzelas to Robinho's third. Hmm. Nice goal. Thank you.
All rather run-of-the-mill stuff from Brazil. Let's hope we see a better test for them on Friday.Looking round the papers, it's clear that this is when the fun starts, with England, the media, the soul-seaching, the hand-wringing, the self-flagellation, the angsting and what not.
Ciao then. But before that, a little P.S. below.
Note to FIFA: You know how I said yesterday you'd take the next logical step and ban replays on your screens at matches? Erm. Shit. I was being sarcastic. Didn't think you'd take something so ridiculous seriously. Sorry...
But, in which case, maybe the next next logical step would be to ban all video transmitting devices that can be brought into the stadium: mobile phones, IPods, IPhones, you know, all sorts of normal stuff? Wouldn't want these pesky fans having access to anything incendiary would we? Let alone those naughty players, or those people on the bench looking at replays. Tsk tsk.
Sunday, June 27, 2010
WC Review: Germany/Argentina
What a game! What a tragi-comedy! Not even the ole bard Shakespeare could've dreamt this one up! England. The Ing-ger-land - crashes to its heaviest-ever World Cup defeat to ye olde enemy, Germany. In the round of 16, no less, when the word before the first kick was made was that semi-finals were the bare minimum.
Ha!
If the poetry behind the defeat was tragic enough, the defending behind the four goals even better. First goal - school-boy stuff. Second too. The third and fourth, caught pants down on the counter-attack following from a free-kick in the German half.
For sure, England did play well, for about 5 minutes from the time Upson scored - rather unexpectedly and against the run of play - till Lampard's goal was missed. What better way to make that defeat even more tragic, than to have a totally legitimate and dreadfully obvious goal missed.
There'll be lots lots and lots said, and there'll be lots more - but the decision on the goal by Lampard was just hilarious. Yes, the referee was culpable; yes, the linesman was an insult to the blind; yes, with the standards of refereeing we've seen this World Cup, it doesn't come as too much of a surprise. But you know who and what look stupidest of all? FIFA, Sepp Blatter and their intransigence over goal-line technology and replays.
Just classic. Millions (if not billions) watching FIFA's World Cup, and this, their headline match of the matches so far, and it's cocked up. Plain and simple. They've cocked up elsewhere before, no doubt, but this has to be the funniest (given my England sentiments) and the most public. (But wait, more was to come in the Argentina game!)
As for England's performance, well, what can be said? First, Rooney was at his best. At doing nothing and looking frustrated. Second, the defence - would've made Wigan Athletic look tidy any day. Third, how can England go through four games of a World Cup, and score just three goals? Gerrard, Defoe and Upson. Upson! Wherefore art thou, ye predators of the English Premier League? You know it's bad when the BBC's own commentators start cannibalising the EPL's best and brightest.
What went wrong? I'd start with these same pundits - for playing it all up in the media hype. Look at it all objectively, and anyone would know that England really, just don't have the pedigree nor the bollocks to deal with games of these magnitude.
As for Argies-Mexico, what can you say? Mexico start off way the better team for the first half hour or so. Argentina can't quite get in it. Then, the goal. Pathetic officiating again. Clear off-side, but the poor Mexicans are let down. I mean, it's almost bizarre. Stadiums now having big screens. These big screens televise instant replays, well, instantly. And, no...everyone has a look, but the referee and his linesman can't. Same thing as in the England game. What can you do. Good luck to all of us waiting for FIFA to stop sitting on their hands. Methinks they're gonna take the next logical step and either (a) ban those giant screens or (b) ban having replays on the screens.
Anyhows, first a crappy mistake from the officials, and then another comical mistake from the Mexicans themselves. Quite unfortunate. Played well for most of the half, but two down at half time. Of course, what better way to vent their frustrations than to get into a little fisticuffs with the Argentinians on the way to the tunnel.
As much as the first two goals were dodgy for different reasons, the third from Tevez was a thing of beauty in itself. Ouch ouch ouch. That would've hurt the net a tad. Game over, and who would begrudge the Mexicans a peachy goal of their own to make it 3-1.
Having watched both England and Argentina at their best today, you can't help but wonder. How is it that one team struggles in qualifying, only to turn up a different team when it really matters. And the other - breezes through qualifying only to turn up a different team too, when it really matters. The answer? Quite simply, is that the first team really, can only be inspired by the pressure, the attention, the enormity of the occasion. And the other, only whithers up, and shrinks. Ah well. Nothing new there.
So, we're just going to have to watch that Argentina keeps it up and hasn't already peaked too early. Next up, though: Argentina v Germany. Now that, is going to be really yummy! Funny isn't it? You get one quarter-final like that, and another with Uruguay v Ghana. I suppose that's what makes it all so riveting.
Finally, something else that I saw in both games today - the matching outfits. And I'm not talking about the jerseys on the pitch. I'm talking here the managers/coaches. What's the deal here? Joachim Low and his sidekick looking decidedly gay, if not daft - as I've mentioned before, and Diego Maradona and his clique looking decidedly Soprano-ish. Not sure what it's for. Strange.
On to Holland then! Hop Holland!
Saturday, June 26, 2010
WC Review: Uruguay/Ghana
From then on, far large parts of the game, Uruguay simply could not build on their lead, much as Korea continued with their uninspired defending. But, as the game wore on, with Uruguay still only one goal to the good, and the Koreans still running their hearts out, you figured something could happen.
And it did. A Bolton player scored too. Lee Chung-yong. Always liked him; too bad he's at Bolton. Pretty sure he'll move in due course though. Anyways, at 1-1, you had to fancy Korea. Still full of energy, and somehow, managing to cut out the defensive shennigans.
But alas. The only thing that would separate the teams at this point was Suarez, and his deciding goal was admittedly deserving.
Looks like Japan will have to restore some Asian pride against Latin American opponents in Paraguay next week.
Oh yeah - one final thing on the game. Was it me, or did anyone else out there also notice two things: (a) the crap crowd - looked like the stadium was half-full, and (b) the crap pitch. The stadium's going to be hosting two more games it seems. Good luck to them.
Before I get to the US-Ghana game itself, let me just have a quick word on the ITV commentary. Peter Drury just irritates me. This time, it was the repeated references to "America". America this, America that. Not sure if the most successful continent thus far in the World Cup would be pleased, but it irritates me, simple enough. Twit.
As for the score, yes. Ghana won. And what a sad night for the US. A strange game it was, in the end. Ghana started off much brighter, and the US - much like Korea - seemed lost in the excitement, and gave away a crappy goal early early early in the game. Much like Korea, again, as the game progressed, the US seemed to get back into it, and they eventually equalised through - who else, Landon Donovan. At that point, you really would've put money on the US to seal the deed. Ghana were on the back foot, and seemed already willing to play for extra time.
You sorta figured out why then. Again, scording early in extra time through more defensive uncertainty. That, unfortunately, was that. The US just did not have enough quality through the team to see them through.
The US team stands on three people: Donovan, Dempsey and Bradley. And there's only so far them three can bring you if the rest of the team don't deliver. I mean, Donovan takes the corners, the free kicks, the penalties, and scores the goals. Case in point: Jozy Altidore.
Has anyone seen as useless a striker as Jozy Altidore? He is such an immense waste of space. I mean, it's bad enough the US are light on that front, but to have Altidore? Holy smokes, he's absolutely abysmal. It's not like he's Mr Invisible. He's pretty involved, but everything he touches seems to end up in nothing. Surreal that it took Bob Bradley 90 minutes to take him off. What a joke.
Oh well. One team I'm watching for is out. All eyes on Holland then.
In the near term, of course, them eyes, are already looking ahead to tomorrow and the crunch match of crunch matches: England v Germany. As can be expected, everyone's pumped up in the England camp, and the media of course, has been more than happy to chip in.
Captain Stevie G's upbeat, and in particular on Waybe Rooney:
"It is only a matter of time before Wayne scores in this tournament and hopefully that is tomorrow."
Hopefully. If not, there's always tomorrow. Or the day after. Take your time, dude. It's just a matter of time. What a crack up.
You know speaking of the media, for some reason, I happened to look at Die Zeit, just to get an idea of how the respectable German media might be hyping this up at this time. Here's a sentence from one such story:
Thomas Müller bezeichnete die Engländer als "geilen Gegner" und der Bundestrainer Joachim Löw urteilte: "Das ist ein besonderes Spiel."
Okay. What the shit does that mean, I hear you say. This is what Google tells me:
Thomas Müller described the Englishman as "horny opponents" and the national coach Joachim Loew pronounced: "This is a special game . The Duel lives on in history. " How right he was.
Looks like Müller's got it spot on. Horny opponents alright, but horny bastards more accurately! Special attention on the likes of Terry, Cole, Rooney then...
Alright. G'night. My thoughts are with Bill Clinton - it was nice to see him cheering the USA on.
Friday, June 25, 2010
WC Review: Brazil/Portugal & Spain/Chile
"They have spirit too - they came from two goals down against Slovenia to get a draw and scored in injury time against Algeria to go through." Exactement!
"So I can see them reaching the semi-finals and then who knows what might happen." Who knows, who knows.
Thursday, June 24, 2010
WC Review: Paraguay/Slovakia & Holland/Japan
Who would've thought. Looks like a real passing of the old guard. Slovakia, who until little more than 20 years ago, did not exist (as an international football team). And when they did, often lived in the footballing shadows of their more illustrious brethren. And Italy, most celebrated and most recent of European champions of the world. Sheesh. I suppose when you have a bunch of geriatrics running around with a bunch of young 'uns brought up in a decrepit Serie A, this is what you get.
A word too for New Zealand, who finished above Italy, and at times, threatened to even top the damn group. What a run, what a team, and what a World Cup for them. My hats off, and my deepest respect. Unbeaten too, and this from a team expected to be the whipping boys.
As for the other deciding games - what a show too from Japan. Was it me, or did Japan just score the first goals from free-kicks this World Cup? Not Portugal, Brazil or Argentina? I might be wrong, but a funny thought that would be. I suppose that would be perfect fodder for the anti-Jabulani crowd. I suppose they might be right. At least as far as the free-kicks are concerned. But full credit to Honda for a screamer of Ronaldo-esque proportions, and shortly after, another peach from Endo. (Was going to attempt a lame pun on Honda, but thought better).
You gotta feel good for the Japanese. Who on this form, do look good going into their game with Paraguay. In particular, you'll have to keep your eye on Honda. Methinks big-money move is in the works for the man.
I do feel kinda let down by the Danes though. I'd expected a little more, but in the end they simply ran out of steam, after their heroics against Cameroon. Bent Nick could not by himself mitigate against the overall lack of real quality in the team. Ha. But hey - great thing Nick's now getting himself a rest.
Oh yeah - nearly forgot. There was the little matter of the meaningless game between Holland and Cameroon as well. RVP's gotten off the mark - which is as much as could be said of the game. (Of course, the fact that the TV was tuned to Japan-Denmark might have something to do with that). Whatever the case, I'm just pretty chuffed with Holland's (should be) easy next game with Slovakia.
Looking forward, much fun tomorrow with Spain and Switzerland. Let's see if Spain does a France and Italy. Really, the end of the old world in football, eh?
You know, the longest ever match in tennis just ended at Wimbledon today. 70-68 in the 5th set to John Isner. Over Nicholas Mahut. Yes, nobody really knows who they are, but now everyone will. It look more than 11 hours. Can you imagine? Thank god for 90 minutes, extra time, and penalties. I could never imagine. Yes, it was some entertainment. But try imagining England v Algeria at 0-0 for 11 hours.
With that rather somnulent thought, I'm going to bed. Ta.
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
WC Review: US/England & Germany/Ghana
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
WC Review: Uruguay/Mexico & Argentina/South Korea
Monday, June 21, 2010
WC Review: Portugal, Switzerland and Spain
Hm. Portugal scored seven then. I'd hoped for, and bet on a draw. Makes me look kinda stupid then, eh? Oh well. Thought the North Koreans could be counted on for another massively organised performance, but que sera sera. Poor dudes. Gotta feel sorry for them. Basically folded after the second goal. But, but, but...even if they lost, even if they crumbled, they still put in a good, professional performance bereft of pathetic rolling around, theatrics, yelling, etc. For that, they've already got my vote as winners this World Cup.
As for Portugal, I still think they've peaked a tad too early. Well, at least that's my biased point of view. It'll be interesting to see what happens when they play Brazil, though things in Group G look rather academic in all seriousness.
The second game led me to think: there must be something about the nervous systems of professional footballers. Except for those coming from North Korea. And exacerbated by the thin South African air. Everything seems to be linked to facial nerves, you know. You touch a guy on his neck, he clutches his face. You touch a guy on his shoulder, he clutches his face. Squeeze a guy's bollocks and I half suspect he'd clutch his face. Every damn body part's linked to their face. What is up with these people, man?
You know who I blame? Besides silly adults behaving like children, that is. Crap referees. And there've been more than a couple this World Cup. In fact, there've been too many, and they've basically killed off several games with stupid decisions, and no decisions on other occasions.
The latest crap decision came of course in that Chile-Switzerland game. In my book, an unncessary sending off for Behrami, when a yellow might have been sufficient punishment for swinging arms that were as accidental as they were benign. But a straight red? Only killed off the game as an attacking option for the Swiss.
To top it all off, there's another silly swinging arm/Swiss face-clutching incident later in the second half, and what does Chile get? A yellow. Now what the hell is that? A red there might have been doubly stupid, but at least the ref could claim to be consistently stupid. To only give a yellow only showed that the first was a mistake.
I'm sorry, but apart from the US-Slovenia game, this had to be the worst refereeing I've seen so far.
As far as the game was concerned, well, Switzerland were Switzerland, and had to be doubly so after the sending off. Resolute defending can only get you so far, I suppose, and it was a matter of time (including the 90 against Spain) before they let in a goal. Gotta feel sorry for them, and they really should've equalised at the death through Derdiyok.
As much as the ref in the game sucked, I enjoyed our Japanese friend in the next game as much as I did when he saw to the France-Uruguay time. Good man.Yuichi Nishimura. My bet for the final. Is it coincidence that he is probably only one of three professional referees? Anyway...
Spain 2-0 Honduras. A pretty weird score-line all in all, given Spain's dominance and Honduras' dismal display. The same Spanish afflictions of over-extravagance and wastefulness were on display, this time mitigated at least by two brilliant Villa goals. Leave it to Torres and Ramos, and Spain would probably have drawn 0-0.
Take it from an Arsenal observer. This tippy-tappy stuff is a joy to behold, but all it takes is a Germany to get one over you. A remotely top-level team (i.e. Switzerland) could just punish you. So, yes, a brilliant display from Spain, but the wastefulness has to be a worry. Missed penalty even. Sheesh.
Last games in the group will be interesting. Switzerland must be expected to beat Honduras on tonight's evidence, and Spain will have to work on their finishing against a more credible Chile. It should be fun.
Elsewhere, I was just looking through all the comments coming out of Arsenal after England's first draw against the US, and it's funny to see what Le Boss said:
"But I believe England will qualify easily. I can't imagine that they won't go through. In a World Cup, a draw in the first game is not a bad result."
He couldn't imagine it. Same as not being able to imagine a group of adults throwing a hissy fit and boycotting training? Just as we could not imagine John Terry (Mr ex-Captain, Mr I-Slept-With-My-Best Mate's-Girlfriend) trying the same trick at inciting revolution? The weird and wonderful eh?
I mean (and I hope this is the end of it), let's face it. It's okay to suck. It's okay to play badly. It's okay to choke under pressure. It's okay not to have talent. It's all okay. Footballers are human.
But footballers are also adults, and it's therefore NOT okay to throw hissy fits, not okay to get all worked up after two bad results, not okay to forget that unfortunately, you're supposed to be role models of sorts. God forbid the day my son has a footballer for a role model for anything other than footballing skills.
So I say to the French FA: recall the whole bunch of losers. They have no right to be on that pitch against the hosts. Seems I'm on the right page as the French Sports Minister. Words used: morale disaster; no longer heroes for our children; destroyed the dreams of our countrymen; tarnished the image of France.
Exactement, Madame le Ministre. But judging from the scale of the issues at hand, not sure where she's going to start, really.
Or more accurately, the French and English training camps...
Sunday, June 20, 2010
WC: Paraguay, New Zealand, Brazil
So there we have it. More fun to come tomorrow in the form of North Korea, Switzerland and Spain. Woo hoo!
Saturday, June 19, 2010
WC Review: Holland, Australia, Denmark
Friday, June 18, 2010
WC Review: Germany, the US and England
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Exclusive Interview: Xavi Hernandez

Xavi Hernandez (XH): It is full of pain, you know? I don't like to looth. Loothing is always very painful. But loothing to Switzerland is...how you say...many more painful.
Arsewiper: Why?
XH: Why? Why you must ask why? If you looth to Brathil, is okay, you know? But Switzerland? Is very difficult. When I am little boy, in escuela, I no learn many things, yes. But I also no learn about this country suiza, you know? What is suiza? When I see this word "Swiss", I am thinking, it is only brand for cuchillos, you know? Is very difficult. It is not football team.
Arsewiper: Er...okay. But now you know where Switzerland is right? They are a real football team!
XH: Yes, yes, of course. It is country near Turkey, no. They have many players with name like Derdiyok and Yakin, yes? Mmmm...
But they also have many player with other name, no? Sorry, I am, how you say...confundido?
Arsewiper: Confused?
XH: Yes, yes. Grà cies
Arsewiper: Xavi, you know we write about Arsenal right?
XH: Yes, when I see that word "arth", I know it is Arthanal.
Arsewiper: We have to ask you, you're always talking about Cesc Fabregas. We've been hearing many things coming out of Barcelona about Cesc. Butwe want the truth. What do you really think about Cesc?
XH: Oh, we all like Cesc very very much. We love him. All of us in Bartha, we love him, very very much. I know he is in Arthanal now, but he is from Bartha, you know? He must come back.
Arsewiper: Why?
XH: I tell you why. There is this song, no? How you say? If you love somebody...set them free?
Arsewiper: What?
XH: Yes, you must let him come back to Bartha?
Arsewiper: Why?
XH: Because we love him. Very much.
Arsewiper: How much?
XH: Very very much. It is special you know?
Arsewiper: Tell me.
XH: Okay, I tell you. Only to help you understand, okay? You will not say this in the diario, no?
Arsewiper: I am not diario.
XH: Okay. You see. We like him so much. Sometime, when we play together with Spain, it is special. I like best the time in the...how do you say...room for changing? After the game?
Arsewiper: Yes............
XH: Yes, when we see him, you know...Andres, Carles, Sergio and me of course...when we see him in the...
Arsewiper: Changing room?
XH: Yes, we get really happy. You understand? Very happy. Excitado? Yes?
Arsewiper: No, I don't understand.
XH: Is like in Barca, after football game, when we are in the...changing room, especially in the bathing tub? We are all nus, and is very nice. We are always wishing Cesc is there with us.
Arsewiper: Okay...
XH: You want to listen to more? Really, Cesc is in our blood - the Barca blood, and we are also in Cesc. He must come to us. Since he is young boy, since we are all little boys, we have been playing with each other...
Arsewiper: Okay, really, thank you. Thank you, Xavi. Thank you. I think we'd had enough of Cesc. So who's going to win the World Cup?
XH: Who is going to win? Of course Espanya! Is always me, Andres, Carles, we win everything. Even in the Lliga de Campions, we are winning. We are Campions! Always!
Arsewiper: Er, Xavi, I think you lost to Inter in the semi-finals.
XH: No, no, is not possible. We win. We always winning. We are Barca. There is only winning for Barca. Loothing is not possible.
Arsewiper: Okay, thank you, Xavi. Thank you for your time.
XH: My pleasure. Thank you. But really, we are not loothing, is not possible. You remember, okay?
Arsewiper: Okay.
WC Review: France, Argentina, Greece (?)
All in all, it's a nice balanced fixture list. None of that concentration of key games right at the end. We can possibly get a good start, and should hopefully be in a nice place by the time we play Man U at home (!) on 30 April.
Now I'm going to have to look into my travel-related arrangements in August...
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
WC Review: Spain, Spain, Spain!!
Spain - the team of half Barca-pains-in-the-arses, the team of beautiful football, of that confidence and arrogance of a team that believes it has already won before the first kick - would lose, to Switzerland. Switzerland, the country which while they love their nati, don't really take their football THAT seriously. Afterall, methinks they take their football less seriously than Xavi takes himself. Wonder how it feels for Xavi, Puyol, Iniesta, Pique, Busquets and Villa to lose to a team that takes ice-hockey, walking, cows and Nespresso more seriously than them. (Question: apart from North Korea, I wonder if there's any other national team out there that boasts more than half of the team from just one club. Answer: Probably none. Conclusion: North Korea still are that much more likeable).
It's just brilliant. I'm going out and buying a Swiss football jersey tomorrow.
So let's look at the stats. Spain: total dominance. Spain: 25 shots on goal. Spain: with all the hot-shot players of a golden generation. Spain: losers. To Switzerland. I just can't get enough!
I mean, this just opens up Group H then. Switzerland on three points with Chile and Honduras to play, should get through with just a win over Honduras. Keep your eye on the ball, and it should be fine. Chile, with a draw against Switzerland and finally against Spain, should get through too. And who doesn't? Spain! I just can't get enough! No clues for who I'm supporting when that Spain-Chile tie comes around.
As far as the Swiss performance was concerned, it was quite amazing. Yes, they did put Italy to the sword in their last friendly, but there was no clue to their defensive stability. But more than that, all I can put it down to is crap finishing. Spain played the beautiful game, right up to the final third, but when it came to it, fired blanks. It was like Arsenal redux in our worst nightmare! Don't you just love it when graft wins over arrogant swaggering?
Why did Spain lose then? Wastefulness? Arse luck? Switzerland's defensive tactics? Perhaps. But you know what I think? Bad karma man! A team is a sum of its parts, and unfortunately, it's almost all Barca. And Barca? They've had it coming for a long long time, thinking they're above the game. See what happened with Inter? Let's hope we see more of today. NB: I was kinda hoping the camera would zoom in on the crying Xavis, Iniestas, Puyols and all, but alas, no such joy.
So what else is there to talk about? Oh yeah, a word on jerseys. What is it about this new thing of ultra tight jerseys? Isn't that like a 70s thing - which had the short shorts to go along as well? (See: Gerd Muller). Anyway, you know what I'm talking about. I kinda thought it was a brand thing initially. Nike, with their normal, conservative, but athletic and traditional look to things - i.e. Holland, Portugal, the US. Then there's Puma, which is the worse culprit when it comes to ultra-tight, nipple-revealing shirts. See: Ivory Coast, Italy, Cameroon...get the drift? When it comes to Adidas, it's a bit of a mixed bag. You have the French, who have perfected the art of looking daft in their shirts two sizes too small, while at the same time, you have the rather decent and spiffy looking Germans.
So what is it? I say it's a national thing - whether everyone takes the size they should wear, or go one down. It's says a lot - France, Italy, Ivory Coast types: nipples, good. Six-pack (or lack thereof): good; and the conservative types opting not. I mean - what more stupid image can there be of Nicolas Anelka skulking, sulking, moping around in a faux swim suit on a football pitch? The French should think about this just as much as Raymond Domenech. Les Blues may think they're doing a Russell Crowe/Gladiator thing, but they're looking more like Zoolander, I'm afraid.
Of course, then there's the England jersey. Wannabe throw back to the 60s' kinda look, I'll say. And we all know where that's coming from. Whatever it takes, I suppose.
There's been a lot said about Australia these days, and their chances of scoring a goal, getting a point, getting past the group stage, whatever. But I think I know what they need to do. Get creative with the names, I say! I mean, really, no offense, but no Brazilian, Spanish, Argentinian or German is going to be anywhere intimidated intimidated by Scott Chipperfield, David Carney, Mike Milligan, Josh Kennedy, Brett Holman, Jason Culina or Luke Wilkshire on the back of the Australian shirt.
Try one of those one word names instead: Celçao, Carlito, Miliesta, Kéké, Holsão, Culinho or Lucas. What's the harm? It works, I tell you. Your chances of winning the World Cup rise quite quite substantially if you have a one-word, Portugese or Spanish sounding name on your shirt.
Ahhh...that's enough for today then. There's the little thing of South Africa-Uruguay in a few minutes. Can't believe we're already six days in. You gotta love the World Cup.
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
WC Review: New Zealand, Portugal, North Korea
What can you say about the North Koreans? Sure, they lost in the end, but that was the most professional, determined and worthy proponents of the values of sportsmanship and "Respect" that I've seen in a long long time. If ever. You know what struck me most about the game? Besides the fact that they managed to snuff out the best of Brazil for 55 minutes through sheer graft? Besides the fact that the World #1 needed a flukey first goal, and let in a scorcher of a consolation? I'll tell you what: the sheer absence of whinging, whining, theatrics, diving, expletives, invisible card-waving - you know what I mean. It was just brilliant, watching a football game and not have to see any of that. I loved it, and hats off to the North Koreans for allowing us that privilege.
One more thing: there was not a single North Korean injury worthy of anyone getting on the ground till minute 67. Just amazing. Of course, the fact that the North Koreans were who they were also brought out the best in Brazil. It was a nice change of sportsmanship, hand-shaking and mutual respect.
The fact that the game came after watching Portugal v Ivory Coast was really quite poetic, where you had the best of Ronaldo, all sorts of diving, expletives - you name it. The fact that the game ended goalless was academic. Neither team wanted to lose, and seemed content to let their games with Brazil decide their fates. Such an approach would of course predicate a win for both over North Korea. No guarantee, I'll say. Can't wait to watch Ronaldo come up against my new North Korean friends.
Finally - New Zealand. You gotta feel really happy for them. First point ever in the World Cup, and what a way to get it. Wonder what the odds were for the All Whites getting a higher points return than Australia, before things started. Whatever the case, well worth a bet right now!!
One for the road. My next bet, and a rather frivolous one (which I can afford now): Spain to win 3-0 against the Swiss. Check it out. Ciao.
Monday, June 14, 2010
WC Review: Germany, Holland, Italy
Elsewhere, last night was pretty sad viewing. Australia were in it for the first 5 minutes or so, but after that, it was simply a case of being in a different league altogether. A different night in their finishing, and Germany could've run away with 6 or 7. A word though, for the Mexican referee. He seemed to have a generally decent game all round, but the decision to send Tim Cahill for his challenge was a total travesty. Absolutely ridiculous, it may have been an iffy yellow, but red was total stupidity. If there's anything worthy of a challenge at arbitration, this would be it.
So Germany were impressive, but that had as much to do with Australia being out of their league than Germany being that great. Sure, as of now, Germany's performance I'd say trumps that of Argentina, but it's early days yet.
As far as Holland went, well, the first half was pretty much yawn-yawn. Denmark defending really well, limiting their ambitions going forward, and everyone at second gear in the mid-day heat. Being behind the Dutch this time round though, I'd have to say the relatively slow start - 2-0 all things considered - ain't necessarily a bad thing. They've come into the finals on incredible form, so to have to take time getting into form is just the thing to get them into the right strides later on.
RVP had some flashes of his usual brilliance, but again, not his best. Methinks the best of Sneijder, RVP and Robben is yet to come.
As for Italy, well, Italy was Italy. Basically showed why really they won't be defending their title. Utterly unconvincing, stirred into action only when really necessary, and otherwise pretty much yawn-inducing.
One thing before we get to the final point. Seems like Captain Patrice Evra has figured out why they're so crap. It's the vuvuzuelas, you see. First, they keep them up at night (wonder what time's lights out for the boys), and secondly, they can't like, communicate with each other on the pitch. Poor things. And I was really wondering what was up with them. Thanks, Patrice.
Another things on the stadiums. Was it me or have there been quite a few sadly empty stadiums? I mean, the game between Japan and Cameroon was already played at one of the smaller stadiums - with the Free State Stadium listed as being 45,000. But shit, it seems something like 31,000 showed up. That's two-thirds full. For a World Cup. Involving an African country. Something not quite right if you asked me. But who am I to say. Arsewiper that I am.
It's been the same for quite a few games. Fingers crossed for some of the so-called lesser marquee games. I hope the likes of New Zealand, Slovakia, Chile, Costa Rica and Honduras get a decent-enough crowd worthy of a World Cup. But hey - as far as the authorities are concerned, as least they'll get the vuvuzuelas right?
Finally (and thanks to Arsewiping reader Kumar for this), if there was any doubt why Adebayor isn't an Arsenal player, this is it. You can sorta understand how the BBC managed to get him as a "pundit"....What a joke.
"You know boy, we've got to get ourselves an African. This is, after all, South Africa. No good having Gary with Alan, Lee and the usual bunch pretending like we're in jolly London, is there??"
"Yes sir, good idea, Sir."
"Well?"
"Er, Didier Drogba, Sir!!"
"Don't be an idiot, boy. He's supposed to be playing! Ivory Coast, remember!?!? Think of someone our viewership could relate to. One of our teams, or the better foreign ones. Come on..."
"Oh, yes, sir. Eboue? Toure? There're two Toures too! Or...Eto'o..."
"They're ALL playing, you fool! Let me help you...let's see..Togo maybe."
"But...what's Togo? Togo where?"
"I've got it. That guy. With the hair, can't really talk properly, but takes payment for just about anything..."
"That would be Emmanuel Adebayor, Sir."
"Exactly. Get him. Just chuck him a couple of quid. Maybe 5. I'm sure he'll take it. He won't be doing anything else anyway."
So the BBC got their hands on Adebayor. What a professional he is. On and off the pitch.
Saturday, June 12, 2010
WC Review: England, Korea and Argentina
Anyways, England. Ah, England. The joys ye bring to those who would like to see ye squirm. What larks, Rob Green! All in all though, one point would not be something that England will say that they did not deserve. Apart from the two goals, you could say that the two teams were pretty evenly match. Says alot about England that Emile Heskey would be their man of the match, who really had a much better first half than second. But then again, for all his good centre-forward play, he was caught off-side on too many occasions, and showed why this striker does most things well except score goals when he shot straight at Tim Howard when straight through on goal.
So while the English commentary team were expectedly gushing about Heskey, they were strangely silent about a totally anonymous Wayne Rooney and Frank Lampard. I suppose that what you call selective commentary aimed at not inflaming an already inflammable and fickle English public and media. That too could be said of their treatment of Rob Green. God bless him. That fumble, and the next save he makes and the commentary team yells out: "Redemption!!" Someone out there remind them about chickens, hatching and counting...
As for the US, a pretty decent performance too, and they do deserve some credit for not folding after Gerrard's early goal. But I must say, the more I see of Clint Dempsey, the more I want to see him in an Arsenal shirt. The man's everywhere! Scores goals, and he's pretty indestructible too. The kind of challenges he went through...damn, put him in a Spanish or Argentinian shirt and he'd be rolling about in deathly spasms. But he just shrugs them off, and gets going again.
Oh yeah, word too for Landon Donovan. As I've said before, give that man an Arsenal shirt too.
While much can be said about the US team, you gotta say that their players upfront kinda suck. Jozy Altidore (Hull City!!) ain't exactly going to be scaring the likes of the world's best centre-halves. A better strikeforce, and they might have won this game...
With Algeria and Slovenia lying in wait, you'd still expect both teams to get through. The question's gotta be who finishes top. No guarantees on England there, methinks.
Elsewhere, Korea did the deed pretty routinely over an utterly dismal Greek team. I mean, that had to be one of the worst performances I've seen in any World Cup of recent memory. Geez. Looks like they're going to be the whipping boys over the next two weeks, so let's see what Argentina does to them. You have to like the Koreans' chances too though. Pretty impressive. One point from Nigeria should see them through now. As for Argentina - what can you say? You so wanted Nigeria to punish them for not putting them away, and on quite a few occasions, it could've happened. For all the talent out there in front in Tevez, Messi, Higuain et al - they didn't go too much really. But there's probably more in them going forward...or hopefully not.
Ciao then. Not the most riveting games on Sunday unfortunately, save for Germans coming up against the Aussies. Should be interesting viewing at least.
Friday, June 11, 2010
WC Review: Uruguay 0 - France 0
As for the match itself, let's just say player for player, France again showed that they had the talent to win the game easy peasy lemon squeezy. But they had the manager to muck things up, and the cohesion as strong as...well, France. Lloris had little to do, Sagna his usual best, Gallas and Abidal average-ish, Gourcuff decent, Diaby a monster, but thereafter...what horrors. Ribery was nowhere, Anelka was at his sulkiest most irrelevant best, and Govou was indescribably irrelevant. Besides that, there's little of a review to do actually - much ado about nothing, with France barely testing Uruguay's Muslera despite their possession. For all that was on display on the pitch, you had to wonder how the likes of Nasri and Benzema could have been left off the plane.
Diaby. What can you say. It just gives you a certain pride - when you see a team of rather indifferent, some undermotivated professionals making a mockery of their talent - you also see one or two exemplary performances. Diaby showed just what he has been capable of, so here's hoping he'll put in two more games like this. Should do his confidence a world of good in the new season. On that same note - Sagna too.
A few words though, for Uruguay. First, Forlan. Methinks by the next game, he'll click with Suarez, and there should be at least a goal or two between them. Looked the most dangerous forward between both teams, and did a decent job tracking back as well. Second, what can you say about a twit like Lodeiro. Comes on at 65 mins. Gets booked a minute later for something stupid like kicking a ball away or something, and 15 minutes later, gets sent off. Just genius. By that time, though, I knew my bet was won. With France looking increasingly clueless, there didn't seem any chance of them making their possession pay - especially with Uruguay content with the point.
So where to? Can't see France scoring really. And Uruguay looks a decent bet to get through. Played mediocre, but got their point. They should get something against either Mexico or South Africa, so I could just get the predictions right. But we've got a long way to go. Especially France, on that flight back to Paris!
WC Review: South Africa 1 - Mexico 1
You know, there's nothing quite like watching a football game with your friends at the office. Better yet if they're all women. You bet. The questions, comments, suggestions - just out of this world, man:
"Do you think they'd be allowed to wear a watch?"
"Er...why the heck would they want to wear a watch?"
"Well, it were me, I'd like really want to know how much time there is left to play..."
Mmmm. Yes.
"Hey, he's a cutie..."
"Hmm. Yes. That's Carlos Vela. Plays for Arsenal too."
"Ahhhh......"
"Oohh...why's his shirt so tight??"
Anyway, you get the drift. Well, at least there was the added commentary, which helped mitigate against those vuvuzuelas and the French commentary. I think I could tolerate the "attention!", "attention!" every other 2 minutes, or the "corNERRRs", but the vuvuzuelas... What can you say. There's been enough said about it, and FIFA have decided they're here to stay. Maybe one option is to use the mute button as we all know, and then turn on the radio. Methinks the radio commentary would probably tune out a little bit more of those damn giant mosquitoes.
As for the match itself. Typical opening match between two not-so-big-favourites. Ultimately content with one point. Mexico clearly should been at least two up by half time; and of course, somewhere along the line after Mexico's relentless pressure, smart-ass Arsewiper tells his lady colleagues at the office: "Just you watch. South Africa's going to score..."
And so they did. Mexico comes out after half time a totally different crap team, and South Africa are made to look that much better. I mean, Tshabalala scored. You gotta love his name, if not the team. Tshabalala! It's just so Shanana. Would've loved listening to the South African commentary at this point... "TSHABALALA! TSHABALALA! TSHABALALA! TSHABALALA!"
Anyhows, Mexico look crapper and crapper as the game goes by, not doing very much with their possession, and off goes Vela for his grandfather, Blanco. Poor geriatric dude. (By now, the added female commentary's on how geriatric Blanco looks compared to Giovani Dos Santos).
So despite the odds, I'm willing Mexico on at this point. Yeah, I don't think on the night South Africa would've deserved the 3 points. And their goal celebrations were, to say the least, just the type of celebrations that would look extra stupid after conceding an equaliser. Guess who equalises then? I actually did a "yay!!", only to realise that it was Rafael Marquez. Damn Barca Marquez. My hex on all things Barca this World Cup didn't last long then, did it?
All in all, a rather ordinary match that was. Not the best standard of play, rather ordinary, slow pitch and some pretty bad defending - see the chance where MPHELA (capitalised for Mphasis) strolls past two Mexican defenders chasing for a long ball, gets his toe to it, only to hit the post.
Not impressed by either. The Arsewiper had predicted South Africa/Uruguary to get through from Group A. Will have to watch that review my rather biased prediction. Let's see.
Ciao ciao.
